Meat Distribution Part 2: Technology on the Range

Agriculture, Distribution & Supply Chain, Marketing, Meat — By on August 22, 2011 11:59 am

[Editors Note: This is the second story in a series about meat distribution. Food + Tech Connect will run these stories every Monday for the next several weeks.]

“The question is, do you really want to be a rancher, or do you want to be a meat company,” says Loren Poncia of Stemple Creek Ranch, as we stand in the middle of his family’s 1000 acres of organically certified pasture in Tomales, California. “Personally I want to be a rancher. I am good at it, and I love when a customer tells me, “that was the best meat I have ever had.” But I don’t love the logistics it takes to get it to them.”

The amazing amount of work it takes ranchers like Poncia to get their meat from ranch to plate stems from three facts about the organic, local and grass-fed meat business in the U.S.

First, grass-fed cows and foraging pigs take a long time, and a lot of land, to grow to market size when compared to their (subsidized and feed lotted) corn-eating cousins. This makes “local” beef far more expensive to raise. And it means Stemple Creek beef needs to sell at a premium price for Poncia to recoup his costs.

Second, Americans like steak – tenderloin, ribeye, new york strip. Yet on a full grown steer, only 75 pounds are choice cuts of a 1200 pound live steer. If ranchers or distributors are to sell steaks instead of whole or half cows, they then have to find somewhere to unload hundreds of pounds of ground beef, shanks and oxtail.  This means more individual sales, and more of Poncia’s time.

Thirdly, if you are not part of the large-scale meat distribution chain in America, it is physically difficult to get your meat from rural pasture to city-living consumer. Slaughterhouses are few and far between, and if you are not dealing in a lot of volume, large supermarkets are not likely to sell your brand. Nor are restaurant chains. Luckily for Poncia, his land is close a major metropolitan area (San Francisco) and city-slickers now interested in buying grass-fed beef directly from him. But most ranchers in the country are not so lucky.

So Poncia and his family have decided to take a web-based approach to selling their beef. On their simple but elegant website, visitors can learn about the farm’s practices and owners, then order 1/4, 1/2 and whole animals. The beef is picked up or shipped to nearby customers, or sold at the limited number of local butcher shops now specializing in breaking down whole animals (Lindy and Grundy in L.A. and The Local Butcher Shop, in Berkeley).

Poncia says 90% of the people now buying 1/4, 1/2 and whole animals on line are doing so for their first time – a wonderful trend, he says, but also time consuming. “All of these people are finding us on the web, and many of them then call us,” says Poncia. “So for every cow we sell, that means I have to talk and email with at least 4 people, sometimes more like 8 or 16. It is wonderful to have the connection with the customer, but it takes up a lot of my time.”

So how could technology best serve the needs of a small scale rancher who would rather not spend his time selling meat?

“Even if I used technology for inventory control, I would still have to have a person at a USDA facility slaughter and butcher the cow, package it, box it, drive it and get it to the customer,” responds Poncia. If there was a way to outsource those logistics while preserving the Stemple Creek brand name and price, Poncia says, that would be ideal.

“If there was a better way of doing it, we all would.”

Do you know of an interesting way ranchers, distributors or chefs are using technology to address issues in the meat distribution chain? Please join us in the conversation by using the comment box below, or by contacting Beth Hoffman at beth [at] foodtechconnect.com

 

About Beth Hoffman:
Beth Hoffman has reported on food and agriculture for ten years, airing on NPR, The World, Latino USA, Living on Earth, KUER and KALW , and studied the food system in depth as a fellow and co-lecturer in the Africa Reporting Project at UC Berkeley’s School of Journalism. Hoffman competed a year long documentary project cooking with immigrant women in their homes, has traveled to India, Uganda and Ethiopia to report on rice production and chicken farming, and did a multipart series for KUER on the artistic, cultural and environmental connections we have to food. In addition to spending many hours on-farm in Utah, California and abroad, Hoffman also married into an Iowa farm family and is currently working with her husband to slowly convert the land into a sustainable orchard and hog farm. She currently lives in Albany, California. Hoffman’s previous work can be found on her website at bethaudio.com.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
  • http://twitter.com/HarlanH Harlan Harris

    This is a great and really difficult question. As Poncia points out, the economies of scale allowed by industrial meat production mean that shipping and distribution can be vastly cheaper. Sophisticated and clever technology will be needed to set up ordering and distribution networks that can scale *down* to the types of farmer-consumer relationships that people want. I posted a few of my own ideas about this a while back: http://www.harlan.harris.name/2011/05/meat-share-optimization/ Use of the types of optimization techniques that large companies use could let farmers worry about raising animals, and not worry about ending up with surpluses of less-desired cuts.

    But I don’t address the transportation issue, and I’m not sure how to make that work better. How do you get the products to a staging location where consumers can pick them up? What could possibly be an effective staging location? Presumably you don’t want to UPS everything on dry ice — that’s expensive!

    • Beth

       Thanks Harlan for adding your comments and a link to your post to this one – you have a lot of great ideas.

      Some ranchers I have talked to are considering using the already set up UPS and FedEx routes, since those companies are already set up with the infrastructure for delivery without putting more delivery trucks on the road.  But you are absolutely right – there is currently no system to “scale down” our meat distribution to one animal at a time aside from the CSA model.  Perhaps this is a great new venture for someone…

      If anyone has anything in the works they would like to share, please email me at beth@foodtechconnect.com.

      • Beth

        A reader also had this comment – sent to my email:

        Have the ranchers thought of setting up a delivery network? A contracted
        individual with a refrigerated truck could do a weekly delivery route
        in areas that consumers order. A scheduled day of delivery and a
        logistical order of delivery could be worked out to let the consumers
        know when to expect their shipment. A centralized depot for pick up, say
        the slaughterhouse, could be arranged to make waybill and loading
        smooth and efficient. A price for delivery would be substantially
        reduced by reigning in the fuel and labor cost this way.

        Paying for the delivery driver(s) could be done an a monthly co-op basis
        so the ranchers would know in advance their shipping fees. There would
        probably have to be about 20 deliveries to each geographical area to
        make it worthwhile to the delivery driver and cost effective to the
        ranchers. The price per delivery could be reduced to about half what
        FedeX would charge.

        The details, I don’t believe, are that daunting. I’m in the logistics
        business. The question is: Do they have enough volume of business to
        make it worth while for the delivery truck? Will the number of shipments
        allow the contractor to pay for his truck, fuel, maintenance and turn a
        profit? They just need to focus on the cows, leave the logistics to the
        contracted driver. The driver doesn’t want to be in the meat packing
        business either

  • Pingback: Trend Report 2011: Meaty Opportunities for Tech | Food+Tech Connect

  • Pingback: AgLocal Bringing Power to the Meat Lover | Food+Tech Connect